Genetically Modified Rice Adoption: Implications for Welfare and Poverty Alleviation
Kym Anderson , Lee Ann Jackson , Chantal Pohl Nielsen
Journal of Economic Integration. 2005;20(4):771-788.   Published online 2005 Dec 1     DOI: https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2005.20.4.771
Citations to this article as recorded by Crossref logo
The socioeconomics of genetically modified biofortified crops: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hans De Steur, Joshua Wesana, Dieter Blancquaert, Dominique Van Der Straeten, Xavier Gellynck
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.2017; 1390(1): 14.     CrossRef
Determinants of Comparative Advantage in GMO Intensive Industries
PAMELA J. SMITH, BOLORMAA JAMIYANSUREN, AKINORI KITSUKI, JOOYOUNG YANG, JAESEOK LEE
World Trade Review.2017; : 1.     CrossRef
An overview of agriculture, nutrition and fortification, supplementation and biofortification: Golden Rice as an example for enhancing micronutrient intake
Adrian Dubock
Agriculture & Food Security.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
Antipodean agricultural and resource economics at 60: agricultural innovation
Julian M. Alston, Philip G. Pardey
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Ec.2016; 60(4): 554.     CrossRef
Are GMO Policies “Trade Related”? Empirical Analysis of Latin America
Pamela J. Smith, Erik S. Katovich
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy.2016; : ppw021.     CrossRef
Trade and Distributional Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops in India: A CGE Analysis
Amrita Chatterjee, Sanjib Pohit, Arpita Ghose
Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research.2016; 10(3): 381.     CrossRef
Status and market potential of transgenic biofortified crops
Hans De Steur, Dieter Blancquaert, Simon Strobbe, Willy Lambert, Xavier Gellynck, Dominique Van Der Straeten
Nature Biotechnology.2015; 33(1): 25.     CrossRef
Conceptual framework for ex-ante evaluation at the micro/macro level of GM crops with health benefits
Hans De Steur, Dieter Blancquaert, Willy Lambert, Dominique Van Der Straeten, Xavier Gellynck
Trends in Food Science & Technology.2014; 39(2): 116.     CrossRef
Global value of GM rice: a review of expected agronomic and consumer benefits
Matty Demont, Alexander J. Stein
New Biotechnology.2013; 30(5): 426.     CrossRef
Agricultural Biotechnology: Economics, Environment, Ethics, and the Future
Alan B. Bennett, Cecilia Chi-Ham, Geoffrey Barrows, Steven Sexton, David Zilberman
Annual Review of Environment and Resources.2013; 38(1): 249.     CrossRef
“Golden Rice”, a GMO-product for public good, and the consequences of GE-regulation
Ingo Potrykus
Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology.2012; 21(S1): 68.     CrossRef
Lessons from the ‘Humanitarian Golden Rice’ project: regulation prevents development of public good genetically engineered crop products
Ingo Potrykus
New Biotechnology.2010; 27(5): 466.     CrossRef
Economic impacts of policies affecting crop biotechnology and trade
Kym Anderson
New Biotechnology.2010; 27(5): 558.     CrossRef
Benefits of genetically modified crops for the poor: household income, nutrition, and health
Matin Qaim
New Biotechnology.2010; 27(5): 552.     CrossRef
Distorted Agricultural Incentives and Economic Development: Asia's Experience
Kym Anderson
World Economy.2009; 32(3): 351.     CrossRef
Comparing Open-Ended Choice Experiments and Experimental Auctions: An Application to Golden Rice
Jay R. Corrigan, Dinah Pura T. Depositario, Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr, Ximing Wu, Tiffany P. Laude
American Journal of Agricultural Economics.2009; 91(3): 837.     CrossRef
The Economics of Genetically Modified Crops
Matin Qaim
Annual Review of Resource Economics.2009; 1(1): 665.     CrossRef
Recent and Prospective Adoption of Genetically Modified Cotton: A Global Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of Economic Impacts
Kym Anderson, Ernesto Valenzuela, Lee Ann Jackson
Economic Development and Cultural Change.2008; 56(2): 265.     CrossRef
The World Trade Organisation's Doha Cotton Initiative: A Tale of Two Issues
Kym Anderson, Ernesto Valenzuela
The World Economy.2007; 30(8): 1281.     CrossRef
Reducing Distortions to Agricultural Incentives: Progress, Pitfalls, and Prospects
K. Anderson
American Journal of Agricultural Economics.2006; 88(5): 1135.     CrossRef
GM crop technology and trade restraints: economic implications for Australia and New Zealand*
Kym Anderson, Lee Ann Jackson
The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resourc.2005; 49(3): 263.     CrossRef