Register  |  Login  |  Inquiries  |  Sitemap
Advanced Search
Journal of Economic Integration 2014 March;29(1) :165-187.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2014.29.1.165
Price Undertakings in EU Anti-dumping Proceedings – an Instrument of the Past?
Armin Steinbach 
German Ministry of Economics, Berlin, Germany
Corresponding Author: Armin Steinbach ,Tel: +49 15120660846, Email: armin.steinbach@gmail.com
Copyright ©2014 Journal of Economic Integration
ABSTRACT
Price undertakings are alternatives to imposing anti-dumping duties. In the past, almost half of EU anti-dumping measures were price undertakings. This has drastically changed in recent years. We identify four reasons for the decreasing relevance of price undertakings. First, prior to the accession of Eastern European Countries (EEC) to the EU, price undertakings were heavily used vis-à-vis EEC. At the same time, China became frequent subject of anti-dumping proceedings, where undertakings were rarely used due to monitoring issues. Second, unlike anti-dumping duties, price undertakings are often difficult to monitor and can be circumvented more easily. Third, there are reasons related to the suitability of price undertakings to remove dumping practice and injurious effects, particularly in the context of high price volatility. Fourth, price undertakings may have potentially anti-competitive effects, as minimum prices tend to exacerbate competition policies.

JEL Classification
F13: Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
F14: Empirical Studies of Trade
F51: International Conflicts; Negotiations; Sanctions
F55: International Institutional Arrangements
Keywords: International Trade | Anti-dumping | Price Undertakings | Competition
 
REFERENCE
1. Belderbos, R., H. Vandenbussche and R. Veugelers (2004). Antidumping duties, undertakings, and foreign direct investment in the EU. European Economic Review 48. 429-453.
2. Davis, Lucy (2009). Ten years of anti-dumping in the EU: economic and political targeting. ECIPE Working Paper 02/2009.
3. European Commission (1998), Seventeenth Annual Report from the Commission to the European Parliament on the Community’s Anti-dumping and Anti-subsidy Activities.
4. Everaert, Greetje (2003), Technology Adoption under Price Undertakings, Discussion Paper 137/2003 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, LICOS Centre for Transition Economics,
5. Mendes, M. (1991), Antitrust in a World of lnterrelated Economies. The lnterplay Between Antitrust and Trade Policies in the U.S. and the E.E.C, Bruxelles: Editions de l’Universite de Bruxelles.
6. Messerlin, Patrick (1989), The EC Antidumping Regulations:A First Economic Appraisal, 1980–1985, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 125, pp. 563–87.
7. Moore, Michael O. (2005), VERs and Price Undertakings under the WTO. Review of International Economics, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 298-310.
8. Pauwels/Springael, AEJ June 2002, Vol. 30, No.2, 121-135.
9. Perone, Francesco (1995), Settlement of Anti-Dumping Cases by Price Undertaking: The European Community and United States Practice Institute of Comparative Law, McGill University, August 1995.
10. Prusa, Thomas and Skeath, Susan (2002). Modern commercial policy: Managed trade or retaliation? Choi, E. K. and J. Hartigan (eds.). Handbook of International Trade. Vol. II. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
11. Rovegno, L. / Vandenbussche, H., A comparative analysis of EU Antidumping rules and application, Discussion Paper 2011, Nr. 23.
12. Stegemann,K. (1990), EC Anti-Dumping Policy: Are Price Undertakings a Legal Substitute for Legal Price Fixing, Review of World Economics 126, pp. 268-98.
13. Tavares de Araujo, José (2001), Legal and economic interfaces between antidumping and competition policy, Division of International Trade and Integration, United Nations, Santiago, Chile, December.
14. Tharakan, P. K. M. (1991). The political economy of anti-dumping undertakings in the European Communities. European Economic Review 35. 1341-1459.
15. Van Bael and Bellis (2011), EC Anti-Dumping an Other Trade Defence Instruments, 5th edn., Alphen aan den Rijn, Kluwer Law International.
16. Vandenbussche, World Competition. Law and Economic Review, 1995, 55-74.
17. Vandenbussche, Hylke / Wauthy, Xavier (2001), Inflicting injury through product quality: how European antidumping policy disadvantages European producers, European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 17.2001, 1, p. 101-116.
18. Vermulst, Edwin and Daniel Ikenson (2007) Zeroing Under the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement: Where Do We Stand?, Issue 6, pp. 231–242.
19. Zanardi, Maurizio (2004), Anti-dumping: What are the Numbers to Discuss at Doha?, The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 403-433.
TOOLS
PDF Links  PDF Links
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
Supplement  Supplement
  E-Mail
Share:      
METRICS
0
Crossref
1
Scopus
1,755
View
9
Download
Editorial Office
Center for Economic Integration, Sejong Institution, Sejong University, 209, Neungdong-Ro, Gwangjin-Gu,
Seoul, 05006, Korea
TEL : +82-2-3408-3338    FAX : +82-2-3408-3338   E-mail : jei@sejong.ac.kr
Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers |  About
Copyright© by Center for Economic Integration. All right reserved.